Maybe if we chose simply nuttx + nuttx-apps then it would be easier to separate step by step nuttx-doc, nuttx-cpu from "just" nuttx? Sooo manyy chooiiccesss :-) :-)
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 12:01 AM Tomek CEDRO <to...@cedro.info> wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2022 at 9:01 PM Alin Jerpelea wrote: > > how about > > nuttx-core > > nuttx-apps > > rtos part would clearly say what is NuttX even / especially for people > who do not know it yet, i.e. FreeRTOS is self-explanatory :-) > > thus nuttx-rtos + nuttx-apps / nuttx_rtos + nuttx_apps whatever fits > required conventions seems more intuitive :-) > > core looks more like a library or a coredump and does not really > directly leads to rtos :-) > > if project repo split is planned at some point then it could be > nuttx-kernel, nuttx-libs, nuttx-drv, nuttx-cpu-riscv, > nuttx-board-esp32c3, nuttx-doc, nuttx-apps, etc, maybe even higher or > lower granularity :-) > > but whatever works and is more desired would be fine i am sure that > there will be ways to overcome toolchains limitations when stuff > inside fits requirements :-) > > -- > CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
