I vote for nuttx and nuttx-apps.
I agree with the above reasons for using dashes (-) instead of underscore.

On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 12:12 PM Pierre-Noel Bouteville <pnb...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Why not NuttxKernel and NuttxApp?
>
> Envoyé de mon iPhone
>
> > Le 18 nov. 2022 à 15:43, Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang781...@gmail.com> a écrit
> :
> >
> > But NuttX has more features than traditional RTOS(e.g. FreeRTOS).
> Actually,
> > Xiaomi uses it in the IoT space which has less real time requirements.
> > Other similar OS(e.g. Zephyr) doesn't append rtos suffix.
> > So, I prefer keep nuttx and nuttx-apps.
> >
> >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 1:39 PM Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> hi
> >> I think that nuttx_rtos and nuttx_apps is cleaner
> >>
> >> Best regards
> >> Alin
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2022, 01:11 Alan C. Assis, <acas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I like the second option:
> >>>
> >>> 2) nuttx_rtos and nuttx_apps
> >>>
> >>> It makes clear that it is a RTOS :-)
> >>>
> >>> BR,
> >>>
> >>> Alan
> >>>
> >>> On 11/17/22, Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> As mentioned in the other thread, the repos need to be renamed to
> >>>> remove "incubating".
> >>>>
> >>>> In the discussion from a few months ago [1] several reasons were given
> >>>> why not to use hyphens in the names (they confuse some tools and
> >>>> underscores are safer).
> >>>>
> >>>> Two possibilities for repo names were given:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1) nuttx and nuttx_apps
> >>>>
> >>>> or
> >>>>
> >>>> 2) nuttx_rtos and nuttx_apps
> >>>>
> >>>> Which do we want?
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Nathan
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/8fn2m2v8qd3sl9r8jg4bs2f9xq7mwg85
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>


-- 
Gustavo Henrique Nihei

Reply via email to