I vote for nuttx and nuttx-apps. I agree with the above reasons for using dashes (-) instead of underscore.
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 12:12 PM Pierre-Noel Bouteville <pnb...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Why not NuttxKernel and NuttxApp? > > Envoyé de mon iPhone > > > Le 18 nov. 2022 à 15:43, Xiang Xiao <xiaoxiang781...@gmail.com> a écrit > : > > > > But NuttX has more features than traditional RTOS(e.g. FreeRTOS). > Actually, > > Xiaomi uses it in the IoT space which has less real time requirements. > > Other similar OS(e.g. Zephyr) doesn't append rtos suffix. > > So, I prefer keep nuttx and nuttx-apps. > > > >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 1:39 PM Alin Jerpelea <jerpe...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> hi > >> I think that nuttx_rtos and nuttx_apps is cleaner > >> > >> Best regards > >> Alin > >> > >> > >> > >>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2022, 01:11 Alan C. Assis, <acas...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> I like the second option: > >>> > >>> 2) nuttx_rtos and nuttx_apps > >>> > >>> It makes clear that it is a RTOS :-) > >>> > >>> BR, > >>> > >>> Alan > >>> > >>> On 11/17/22, Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> As mentioned in the other thread, the repos need to be renamed to > >>>> remove "incubating". > >>>> > >>>> In the discussion from a few months ago [1] several reasons were given > >>>> why not to use hyphens in the names (they confuse some tools and > >>>> underscores are safer). > >>>> > >>>> Two possibilities for repo names were given: > >>>> > >>>> 1) nuttx and nuttx_apps > >>>> > >>>> or > >>>> > >>>> 2) nuttx_rtos and nuttx_apps > >>>> > >>>> Which do we want? > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Nathan > >>>> > >>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/8fn2m2v8qd3sl9r8jg4bs2f9xq7mwg85 > >>>> > >>> > >> > -- Gustavo Henrique Nihei