On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 11:12 PM Robert Lipe <robertl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >
> >
> > > The presubmit flips out about C99 comments. Even that's too radical. So
> > > much for being king. :-)
> >
> > You can use C99, but you cannot forgot to follow the Coding Style, //
> > comments shouldn't be used :-)
> >
>
> It's actually worse than that. You can use C99 comments at the end of a
> line
> but not at the beginning
>
> frobnicate();  // this is accepted
> // this is an error


That is a bug in nxstyle.c and should be fixed. Please file an issue or, if
you're inclined, open a PR...

This is perfectly legal C99. That's 20+ years ago and was widely accepted
> before then.


That's true; however this standard and code style are well established in
this project; of course anyone can feel free to open a [DISCUSS] thread to
propose changes but the onus is obviously on them to persuade the community
why it should make those changes.

I see // comments in 48 *.[ch] files. That ship has sailed.


That, too, is a bug and should be fixed.

So I've kicked that back in, but it appears I have to wait for a (gasp)
> human
> to push a button. I assume this is to stop script kiddies from submitting
> bitcoin
> harvesters in the presubmit, but it really hoses a workflow as it's like
> submitting
> a box of punched cards across the table into the Holy Room where computing
> is done and then awaiting a stack of greenbar with the results later in the
> day.


Yes, it's to stop script kiddies with their mining businesses; however IIRC
that only applies to your first PR with a project. I think once your PR
gets merged the next one will go more swiftly.

Hopefully, you're convinced I'm an actual human at this point (even if I
> complain
> too much :-)


Nope. I'm not convinced. :-p

Jokes aside your participation is greatly appreciated.

Cheers,
Nathan

Reply via email to