Thanks Mr Nutt.
Em qua., 7 de abr. de 2021 às 19:31, Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> escreveu: > PR #3476 removes the unused variable from all other architectures. > > On 4/7/2021 3:59 PM, Sara da Cunha Monteiro de Souza wrote: > > Yes, I agree. > > > > Because I took a look at some codes that > > are using the freerun driver (tickless, dhtxx and hcsr) > > and no one use this var. > > > > I think I will "deviate", save some bytes and not create it. > > > > Em qua., 7 de abr. de 2021 às 18:53, Alan Carvalho de Assis < > > acas...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > > >> Hi Sara, > >> > >> Good question, I think the "running" variable is not used. Probably it > >> is a new living being that evolved from the oneshot timer driver where > >> the "running" makes sense to exist. :-D > >> > >> BR, > >> > >> Alan > >> > >> On 4/7/21, Sara da Cunha Monteiro de Souza > >> <saramonteirosouz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I've been implementing the freerun wrapper and I took a look at > >>> the multiple implementations in other chips and I realized that > >>> they initialize the running variable as false in their respective > >>> <chip>_freerun_initialize() function. > >>> > >>> I can't understand. It should be true, shouldn't it? Because this > >>> function starts the counter. > >>> > >>> What am I missing? 🤔 > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> > >>> Sara > >>> >
