PR #3476 removes the unused variable from all other architectures.
On 4/7/2021 3:59 PM, Sara da Cunha Monteiro de Souza wrote:
Yes, I agree.
Because I took a look at some codes that
are using the freerun driver (tickless, dhtxx and hcsr)
and no one use this var.
I think I will "deviate", save some bytes and not create it.
Em qua., 7 de abr. de 2021 às 18:53, Alan Carvalho de Assis <
acas...@gmail.com> escreveu:
Hi Sara,
Good question, I think the "running" variable is not used. Probably it
is a new living being that evolved from the oneshot timer driver where
the "running" makes sense to exist. :-D
BR,
Alan
On 4/7/21, Sara da Cunha Monteiro de Souza
<saramonteirosouz...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I've been implementing the freerun wrapper and I took a look at
the multiple implementations in other chips and I realized that
they initialize the running variable as false in their respective
<chip>_freerun_initialize() function.
I can't understand. It should be true, shouldn't it? Because this
function starts the counter.
What am I missing? 🤔
Best,
Sara
