Hi Alan and Gabor, I don't think that LVGL use of Kconfig should bother NuttX's since the build is always self contained in a directory. The positive side is that we could store a defconfig for LVGL on NuttX instead of the lv_conf.h that is now. Of course it would be cool if you could simply do "make menuconfig" on NuttX and have LVGL options appear there, but I believe that would couple LVGL and NuttX build systems which may not be the best idea. I'm not sure if that can be done cleanly (it would always produce one .config and config.h which both would have to read).
Best, Matias On Tue, Aug 25, 2020, at 21:22, Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Mr. Gábor Kiss-Vámosi contacted and told me that LVGL is moving to use > Kconfig: > > "At LVGL we are planning to add a Kconfig file to the main repo but we > are not sure if it will harm the existing Kconfig based projects. > > Could you comment on what your requirements are and what we should > consider in order to allow NuttX to use LVGL's Kcofig file or - if > it's not possible - to make sure it won't bother your Kconfig file?" > > So, I think this is a good opportunity to make NuttX more integrated > with LVGL. Suggestions are welcome. > > Gábor, I added you CC here because I don't know if you are subscribed > to NuttX at Apache Foundation mailing list. > > BR, > > Alan >
