It is too early to be digging holes. Let's agree where the whole should be dug
before we start digging. Then there will be no one looking over your
shoulder.Sent from Samsung tablet.
-------- Original message --------From: David Sidrane <davi...@apache.org>
Date: 12/23/19 4:10 AM (GMT-06:00) To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re:
Community On 2019/12/22 19:29:38, Gregory Nutt <spudan...@gmail.com> wrote: > >
> Don't feel bad if there is haggling. Any document, no matter who writes it> >
or how well, will need more work to fill in missing pieces, edit, etc., to> >
bring it to "shipping quality." I will try to help as much as I can in the> >
coming days, but as I said I'm really swamped right now.> > But there are
issues of trust related here. I would not trust DavidS > to write objective
work flow requirements now. And I have no reason to > believe that he would
trust me to do so either. Although I can say that > it would be my intention to
produce a fair representation of the overall > discussion, my references would
also be reflected in certain areas.> > > Greg - please realize that anything I
(or you) suggest are just suggestion and examples. We are all going have to
AGREE on what we will implement. Nothing bad is going to happen. None of it is
in stone.I would ask you to not couch thing in trust. It is not about trust. It
is about experience. You have created a wonderful gift to the world, in Nuttx.
Using a "single commiter" model, a set of tools that you manage, and your own
way of working. You referred to yourself as a Github N00B. Other members on
this team use github everyday. Their experience is what is of value here. I
have not doubt that after you are a seasoned GH user of you would be able to
craft the perfect GH work flow. My dad shared this with me once: If you can not
dig a hole, do not stand over someone who is digging and tell them how to dig.
Get the hell out of the way, let them do their job and bring them water.Another
pearl from him is: "You can't push a string"
