All, Let's dispense with the ALL ambiguity
We should assume if it does not say [VOTE] it is not a vote? David -----Original Message----- From: Gregory Nutt [mailto:spudan...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2019 7:09 AM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: Simple Workflow Proposal Again, is this a formal vote? it is not clear to me. Did someone in the PPMC call a vote? There is not [VOTE] in the message title? Just point of order which I do not know the answer too. Brennan is not yet listed as a PPMC member or a as a committer (but he should be and, hopefully, will be). Can non-PPMC members calls votes that are binding on the PPMC? Just to be clear, I think that someone in the PPMC should call the vote with [VOTE] in the title so that is is clear if we are castubg a binding vote or not for something are not? Or are we just agreeing in principle or not? Are these binding votes? We need to clarify what is going on. I think we should stop the habit of using +1 just to indicate we agree with something and we need to enforce the use of [VOTE] in the title so that we know this is a binding vote. On 12/22/2019 7:57 AM, Xiang Xiao wrote: > +1. > It's impotant to let people start the contribution. > The committer could/should do more work to ensure the correction in > review process before the automation tool is ready. > > Thanks > Xiang > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 8:57 PM David Sidrane <davi...@apache.org> wrote: >> This works! >> >> On 2019/12/22 02:05:56, Brennan Ashton <bash...@brennanashton.com> wrote: >>> I really want to let people to contribute (myself included) ASAP so I >>> was >>> to propose this as an option to get going and can be amended later. I >>> know >>> it does not resolve all the issues, but offers what I think is a >>> reasonable >>> avenue to get started. >>> >>> Submit a PR on GitHub against master if it is approved by one commiter >>> (that did not propose it) >> This is key! We need the eyes (and possibly the hands) of the subject >> matter experts, reviewing, commenting and possible fixing submissions. >> >>> it can be merged. The approval is done via the >>> GitHub approval system. >> +1 >>> A commiter may create a PR on behalf of a patch submitted to the mailing >>> list. >> +1 >>> Commiters can ask for others to review or approve. But at the end of >>> the >>> day they are the ones who approve and merge. >> +1 >>> We can and should amend this later, it is likely not enough long term. >>> >>> Could people vote if they think this is fine to start. If you don't >>> agree >>> just note that and we can review where we are at. >>> >>> --Brennan >>>
