Joe, NIFI-6275 [1] has been resolved, and PR 3483 [2] has been merged to master.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6275 [2] https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3483 On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 12:30 AM Jeff <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Joe! I should have an update/resolution for NIFI-6275 tomorrow. > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:48 PM Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Team, >> >> We are pretty much there now it looks like for a 1.10.0. In scanning >> through this thread it looks like the ListHDFS ask from Jeff is perhaps >> the >> only remaining bit. >> >> I'll probably create the RC branch soon so folks can keep moving on master >> and I'll try to pull in other things that look ready/reviewed/etc.. that >> might work. >> >> If you look here >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/NIFI/versions/12344993 we already >> have a *TON* of features/fixes/improvements loaded up on this release. >> >> My goal is to initiate the RC processes this week. >> >> Huge thanks to the many many folks that contributed to getting us this far >> in this release. >> >> Thanks! >> Joe >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 4:21 AM Pierre Villard < >> [email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > +1 for getting a 1.10.0 release soon - a lot of great things has been >> > added. >> > >> > If I may ask, it would be great to have a +1 from a committer on >> NIFI-6159 >> > [1]. >> > The PR has been reviewed by turcsanyip but it would need a final go >> from a >> > committer. >> > However, I do understand that other PRs mentioned in this thread are >> more >> > important (bug related). >> > >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3394 >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Pierre >> > >> > Le ven. 30 août 2019 à 08:21, Jeff <[email protected]> a écrit : >> > >> > > I'd also like to get the PR [1] for NIFI-6275 merged before 1.10.0 is >> > > released. It's an update to ListHDFS so that the scheme and authority >> > are >> > > ignored when using the "Full Path" filter mode. >> > > >> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3483 >> > > >> > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:04 PM Aldrin Piri <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > > I created NIFI-6604 [1] to reduce assembly size and listed it as a >> > > Blocker >> > > > for this release. The issue has a link to the associated discussion >> > > thread >> > > > and an initial PR. >> > > > >> > > > --aldrin >> > > > >> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6604 >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 4:08 PM Matt Burgess <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Mike, >> > > > > >> > > > > I’ll review those two graph PRs tonight or tomorrow (if they’re >> still >> > > > open >> > > > > by then) >> > > > > >> > > > > > On Aug 29, 2019, at 3:43 PM, Mike Thomsen < >> [email protected]> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I have two open graph-related PR's that are really small and are >> > > needed >> > > > > to >> > > > > > close some bugs that will be bad for early adopters: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3571 >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3572 >> > > > > > >> > > > > > If someone wants to review, that'd be great. Otherwise, I can >> merge >> > > > them >> > > > > in >> > > > > > because I'm doing daily work on some graph stuff using a branch >> > based >> > > > on >> > > > > > both patches. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Mike >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:12 PM Joe Witt <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> We had another discuss on that recently and the intent is to >> drop >> > a >> > > > few >> > > > > >> toys off the raft and update migration guidance. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> Thanks >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:02 PM Jeremy Dyer <[email protected] >> > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> +1 looking forward to this. >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>> I recall seeing some issues about Apache Infra and the binary >> > size. >> > > > > Were >> > > > > >>> all of those appropriate modules removed as discussed and the >> > build >> > > > > size >> > > > > >>> will be small enough now? >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:35 PM Bryan Bende < >> [email protected]> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>> +1 Looking forward to getting parameters and Java 11 support >> out >> > > > there >> > > > > >>>> in a release. >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:02 PM Joe Witt < >> [email protected]> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> Team, >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> It looks like we're reaching a point in which it is time to >> > close >> > > > in >> > > > > >> on >> > > > > >>>>> 1.10. >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6595?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.10.0 >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> There are 250+ issues in there nearly 240 of which are >> already >> > > > > >>>> resolved. I >> > > > > >>>>> haven't gone through yet for fully analyzing but the awesome >> > Java >> > > > 11 >> > > > > >>> work >> > > > > >>>>> Jeff Storck and others has done means we can now build on >> Java >> > 11 >> > > > as >> > > > > >>> well >> > > > > >>>>> as run on it. There is a ton of great work on parameters >> which >> > > > will >> > > > > >>> make >> > > > > >>>>> managing flows at scale much easier. We will need to drop >> some >> > > > nars >> > > > > >>>> which >> > > > > >>>>> means we have some migration guidance to update. >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> I'd like to volunteer as RM but if there are any other >> takers >> > > > please >> > > > > >>> let >> > > > > >>>> me >> > > > > >>>>> know. >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> As we close in on releases this tends to create a lot of >> > urgency >> > > to >> > > > > >>>> quickly >> > > > > >>>>> try to get new things in. I will try to manage this well. >> As >> > > > always >> > > > > >>> we >> > > > > >>>>> can do another release. There is no timeline pushing us to >> > have >> > > > such >> > > > > >>>> gaps >> > > > > >>>>> between releases...we can always do another feature release. >> > > That >> > > > > >>> said, >> > > > > >>>> PR >> > > > > >>>>> review bandwidth is at a super premium. We receive a lot >> more >> > > PRs >> > > > > >> than >> > > > > >>>> we >> > > > > >>>>> do receive reviews. We'll have to work this as the PR depth >> > > grows. >> > > > > >>>>> >> > > > > >>>>> Thanks >> > > > > >>>>> Joe >> > > > > >>>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
