Mike, I’ll review those two graph PRs tonight or tomorrow (if they’re still open by then)
> On Aug 29, 2019, at 3:43 PM, Mike Thomsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have two open graph-related PR's that are really small and are needed to > close some bugs that will be bad for early adopters: > > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3571 > https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3572 > > If someone wants to review, that'd be great. Otherwise, I can merge them in > because I'm doing daily work on some graph stuff using a branch based on > both patches. > > Thanks, > > Mike > >> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:12 PM Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> We had another discuss on that recently and the intent is to drop a few >> toys off the raft and update migration guidance. >> >> Thanks >> >>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 2:02 PM Jeremy Dyer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 looking forward to this. >>> >>> I recall seeing some issues about Apache Infra and the binary size. Were >>> all of those appropriate modules removed as discussed and the build size >>> will be small enough now? >>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:35 PM Bryan Bende <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> +1 Looking forward to getting parameters and Java 11 support out there >>>> in a release. >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:02 PM Joe Witt <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Team, >>>>> >>>>> It looks like we're reaching a point in which it is time to close in >> on >>>>> 1.10. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-6595?jql=project%20%3D%20NIFI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.10.0 >>>>> >>>>> There are 250+ issues in there nearly 240 of which are already >>>> resolved. I >>>>> haven't gone through yet for fully analyzing but the awesome Java 11 >>> work >>>>> Jeff Storck and others has done means we can now build on Java 11 as >>> well >>>>> as run on it. There is a ton of great work on parameters which will >>> make >>>>> managing flows at scale much easier. We will need to drop some nars >>>> which >>>>> means we have some migration guidance to update. >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to volunteer as RM but if there are any other takers please >>> let >>>> me >>>>> know. >>>>> >>>>> As we close in on releases this tends to create a lot of urgency to >>>> quickly >>>>> try to get new things in. I will try to manage this well. As always >>> we >>>>> can do another release. There is no timeline pushing us to have such >>>> gaps >>>>> between releases...we can always do another feature release. That >>> said, >>>> PR >>>>> review bandwidth is at a super premium. We receive a lot more PRs >> than >>>> we >>>>> do receive reviews. We'll have to work this as the PR depth grows. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Joe >>>> >>> >>
