2011/5/30 Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>: > Shouldn't it be codehaus-mojo? I'm unclear if you're intending to move the > plugin away from codehaus, or stay here for lists, issues & repository but > move source control.
yup done too :-) : https://github.com/codehaus-mojo > > I would have thought setting up a canonical git repo @ codehaus made more > sense (you can still use github just as effectively, you just need to push > upstream) agree too. As our sources depends on a non profitable orgarnisation (codehaus). (we can simply merge back @codehaus git repos) Perso I don't like a lot the idea about depends on a private company (github). > > On 30/05/2011, at 10:48 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > >> FYI, I have just created the organization maven-mojo >> https://github.com/maven-mojo . (https://github.com/mojo was already >> used). >> >> 2011/5/30 nicolas de loof <nicolas.del...@gmail.com>: >>> The idea is to move the code repo to github and deprecate the svn one (last >>> commit will be a README.txt file >>> GitHub is more than just Git hosting as you noticed. Pull Request, online >>> code editing and notes, and more nice web-based tools are great improvements >>> to make contributing easier. Hosting Git at codehaus would "just" make >>> merges easier compared to svn patches but not change the contribution >>> workflow. >>> I'd be pleased to see this happen at Mojo level, maybe the way Jenkins >>> plugins are grouped under jenkinsci organisation. It's anyway easy to >>> migrate a git repo from one github account to another. >>> >>> Le 30 mai 2011 13:47, Arnaud Héritier <aherit...@codehaus.org> a écrit : >>>> >>>> I like Git too but we should take care of few things : >>>> * We have to take care of giving the ability to all mojo projects. Perhaps >>>> under a dedicated mojo organization @ GitHub ? Or by working with Ben to >>>> have a Git support that satisfies our needs >>>> * The success of Github is mainly due to the fact that they added a lot of >>>> web features and documentations to ease to usage of git thus it is >>>> important >>>> in the choice as "just" moving to Git will increase the level to contribute >>>> to all of thus who don't use it again... (and GitHub provides a svn access >>>> to Git repositories for those who don't have the time to learn Git). >>>> Thus +0 to move to Git, +1 to move to GitHub but in all cases please try >>>> to do that at mojo level and not only for one plugin. >>>> Arnaud >>>> >>>> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> What I understand here : Nicolas like to move "canonical" >>>>> gwt-maven-plugin scm repo to git (means sources not anymore in svn >>>>> @codehaus : or I misunderstand :-) ) >>>>> So two solutions : >>>>> * move to github >>>>> * ask ben or bob to have a git repo @codehaus (AFAIK it's supported ) >>>>> >>>>> Perso, I like git so why not :-) >>>>> >>>>> /Olivier >>>>> >>>>> Le 30 mai 2011 11:59, Arnaud Héritier <aherit...@codehaus.org> a écrit : >>>>>> How will you manage the synchro between SVN@Codehaus and GitHub ?? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:10 AM, nicolas de loof >>>>>> <nicolas.del...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi folks, >>>>>>> I'll start preparation for a 2.3.0 release soon, >>>>>>> starting with this release, I'd like to move the canonical repo to >>>>>>> gitHub >>>>>>> to encourage more contributions, either via pull-request or direct >>>>>>> commit. >>>>>>> I'd like to follow the jenkins-way, with more releases (lets say, one >>>>>>> per >>>>>>> month) and lower contribution barrier. >>>>>>> I've cloned codehaus svn to >>>>>>> https://github.com/gwt-maven-plugin/gwt-maven-plugin, anyone from this >>>>>>> list >>>>>>> with spare time and motivation is welcome :P >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Nicolas >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Olivier Lamy >>>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>>>> >>>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Olivier Lamy >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >> >> > > -- > Brett Porter > br...@apache.org > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > -- Olivier Lamy http://twitter.com/olamy | http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
