Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
-0: As a developer you're expected to follow any issues filed *and* mail
There might be non-committers subscribed to dev@, too, e.g. people that
just donated a plugin and our now probing our interest. I could imagine
that those people are not that much interested in *all* our JIRA traffic.
so what would yet another list that you have to subscribe to give?
Easier browsing/searching of archives. Currently, real discussions are
drowned by JIRA notifications:
http://www.nabble.com/mojo---dev-f11981.html
People might find that acceptable, I personally just don't see the need
to make life harder than necessary and require my poor eyes or some
other post-filtering to separate out stuff that could have been
separated upfront.
You still read the issues, don't you? Tapping "read" for the couple of
issues that might not relate to your plugin is to me less of a hassle
than having developers that ignore the issue list.
In addition it is an important aspect of the Mojo project in
particular that we are a bunch of developers with very varying levels
of knowledge of Maven (some are core developers, other have just
written a plugin that they want to host) and we all need to help each
other out.
Absolutely, but I don't see right now how this would change by having a
dedicated list for JIRA.
Because then they're only going to subscribe to the list without all the
"noise" and risk loosing *critical* information about bugs in their plugin.
--
Trygve
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
