Hi Martin, Design looks better for me now (at this "type" thing but guess the dependency set idea is not liked too so let's keep it), thanks a lot, very impatient plugins start to embrace this new model (in particular on configuration side)!
Side note: we can need to review the new type names before making it live, the legacy ones are....legacy but new ones can need an agreement but that's a very small detail. Best, Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le mar. 9 janv. 2024 à 17:58, Martin Desruisseaux < martin.desruisse...@geomatys.com> a écrit : > Le 2024-01-09 à 16 h 57, Tamás Cservenák a écrit : > > > > Thanks for your effort, I will take a peek at this soon. > > > Thanks. Note that commit 1 can be ignored (it is only cleanup), and > commit 2 (refactoring of DependencyProperties) could be omitted as well > if PathTypes were provided directly as a Dependency method instead of > being stored in DependencyProperties. > > Martin > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >
