Hi, For what it's worth, I would really like to see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1935 / https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/389 merged. It adds support for the SessionLauncher API in JUnit 5. We rely heavily on this API to prevent expensive components being recreated for every test.
Best regards, Emond On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 1:49 PM Slawomir Jaranowski <s.jaranow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Summary for today. > > Decisions waiting to take: > > 1. What version do we want to release 3.0.0 or the next milestone? > 2. What with the road map on the first page ...? > 3. JDK 8 as target - without refactor - will it be acceptable? - cause to > stop upgrading some dependencies like commons-io > 4. Final list of acceptable PR to merge before release > > My proposition of PR to merge before release - please comment on PR. > If no objections in PR I will try process one by one - to mitigate big load > on ci > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1398 > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/160 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1939 > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/387 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1962 > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/398 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1963 > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/399 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1964 > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/400 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1967 > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/407 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1959 > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/412 > > > niedz., 19 gru 2021 o 20:27 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > napisał(a): > > > In my opinion onmy M9 would be worth it but I don't think users care too > so > > we should go with 3.0.0, do other Mx in 3.0.x and if we want to tackle M9 > > items do a 3.1.0 (but not sure it bothers that much to be honest, it is > > more about being "clean" than anything else IMHO). > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > < > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > Le dim. 19 déc. 2021 à 20:17, Slawomir Jaranowski < > s.jaranow...@gmail.com> > > a écrit : > > > > > And what with the road map ... > > > > > > https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/index.html > > > > > > > > > > > > niedz., 19 gru 2021 o 19:32 Slawomir Jaranowski < > s.jaranow...@gmail.com> > > > napisał(a): > > > > > > > For Maven Api at the moment I think only change requirements and > > > > dependency ... without using new features - We are not sure if it > works > > > > with earlier versions anyway - minimal Maven on jenkins is 3.2.5 > > > > JDK 8 - also only target change - will open possibility to refactor > in > > > the > > > > feature > > > > > > > > But we needed to breaker compatibility for next 3.x releases. > > > > So we can start 3.x with such requirements. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > niedz., 19 gru 2021 o 19:18 Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > > > napisał(a): > > > > > > > >> Don't think both are important to release, we can mention we only > > target > > > >> j8 > > > >> without doing the change I think, this one is more than ok now. > > > >> About JSR330 I think we are better staying away from it due to the > > > related > > > >> threads but it is internals anyway so not a big deal for surefire > > IMHO. > > > >> > > > >> Releasing the default change for trimstacktrace is a bigger thing > > > awaited > > > >> since the toggle was introduced for ex, and having a maintained > final > > > >> release is key for users so the only path we can take IMHO. > > > >> > > > >> Romain Manni-Bucau > > > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > > >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > > >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > > >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > > >> < > > > >> > > > > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Le dim. 19 déc. 2021 à 19:10, Slawomir Jaranowski < > > > s.jaranow...@gmail.com > > > >> > > > > >> a écrit : > > > >> > > > >> > What do you think about: > > > >> > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1959 - even 3.2.5 > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1955 ... yes i > know > > > not > > > >> all > > > >> > like it, but when ... if we think about 3.0.0 version it be ok i > > think > > > >> > > > > >> > before release ... > > > >> > > > > >> > niedz., 19 gru 2021 o 19:02 Romain Manni-Bucau < > > rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >> > napisał(a): > > > >> > > > > >> > > AFAIK there was no real change since "Cutting a release for > > > Surefire?" > > > >> > from > > > >> > > april where work was not production ready. > > > >> > > That said I'm happy to get a 3.0.0 and maybe a 3.1.0 later since > > we > > > >> > > abandonned 2 officially and 3 looks quite stable enough. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > >> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > > >> > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > > >> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > > >> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > > >> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > > >> > > < > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Le dim. 19 déc. 2021 à 18:58, Gary Gregory < > > garydgreg...@gmail.com> > > > a > > > >> > > écrit : > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > At work, some of my colleagues balk at seeing milestone > versions > > > in > > > >> our > > > >> > > > builds. What is preventing the next version from being > "3.0.0", > > no > > > >> > "M". I > > > >> > > > thought I read here a while back that the code was production > > > ready. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Gary > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Sun, Dec 19, 2021, 12:26 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Sounds good. > > > >> > > > > I'd really like to review/include this PR as well > > > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/400 > > > >> > > > > I hope to finish the review for this one during the week. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 at 18:22, Slawomir Jaranowski < > > > >> > > > s.jaranow...@gmail.com> > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Last time I did the surefire build more stable. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Now build looks ok on Jenkins > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://ci-maven.apache.org/job/Maven/job/maven-box/job/maven-surefire/job/master/ > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I prepared proposition for using shared GitHub action for > > > >> project > > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/410 > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Most of the tests look stable now. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > There are still about 260 issues on Jira. > > > >> > > > > > Many of them was create some year ago ... so probably are > > not > > > >> > actual > > > >> > > or > > > >> > > > > are > > > >> > > > > > duplicated > > > >> > > > > > Some look like they are in progress without finishing, > > > >> > > > > > I will work with Jira. I will try to ask about current > issue > > > >> > status. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > The last release was in Jun 2020 so 1 and half year ago. > > > >> > > > > > I think that we should plan the next release for Surefire > > > which > > > >> can > > > >> > > > help > > > >> > > > > > resolve some of the issues. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I don't know what the next version should be - in code we > > have > > > >> > > > > > 3.0.0-M6-SNAPSHOT. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > There are also about 30 PRs, some of them also created a > > years > > > >> ago > > > >> > .. > > > >> > > > > > should be closed or merged. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I need your help to plan and finally prepare for release. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Below is the result of the investigation for project > status > > > from > > > >> > > > > repository > > > >> > > > > > perspective and Jira perspective. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Current repository status > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > branch release/2.22.3 > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > f14da3b89 [SUREFIRE-1764] Upgrade JUnit Platform to 1.6.1 > > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/commit/f14da3b89 > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > current version in master is 1.3.2 for > > > junit-platform-launcher - > > > >> > the > > > >> > > > > newest > > > >> > > > > > available version is 1.8.2 > > > >> > > > > > SUREFIRE-1764 - reopened > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > branch release/3.0.0-M6 > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > 8a6b33453 (upstream/release/3.0.0-M6, > > origin/release/3.0.0-M6) > > > >> > > > > > [SUREFIRE-1432] Add extension interface with two > > > implementations > > > >> > for > > > >> > > > > > trimStackTrace > > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/commit/8a6b33453 > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > SUREFIRE-1432 - reopened > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > There is about 130 commit to master since last tag > > > >> > surefire-3.0.0-M5 > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/compare/surefire-3.0.0-M5...master > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > JIRA status > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > RELEASE Backlog > > > >> > > > > > - don't look here ... > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > RELEASE 2.21.1 > > > >> > > > > > - SUREFIRE-1371 - only planed - no PR > > > >> > > > > > - SUREFIRE-1374 - in progres .... some commit exist in > > master > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > RELEASE 2.22.3 > > > >> > > > > > - SUREFIRE-1679 - commit on master OK > > > >> > > > > > - SUREFIRE-1764 - reopened only in release/2.22.3 branch > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > RELEASE 3.0 > > > >> > > > > > 22 issues, 4 issues mark as done but all without changes > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > RELEASE 3.0.1 > > > >> > > > > > 1 issues - SUREFIRE-1430 - only planed > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > RELEAAE 3.0.0-M6 > > > >> > > > > > 69 issues, 46 done, 3 in progress, 20 to do > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > -- > > > >> > > > > > Sławomir Jaranowski > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > Sławomir Jaranowski > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Sławomir Jaranowski > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sławomir Jaranowski > > > > > > > > -- > Sławomir Jaranowski >
