Il giorno mar 21 dic 2021 alle ore 13:49 Slawomir Jaranowski < s.jaranow...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> Hi, > > Summary for today. > > Decisions waiting to take: > > 1. What version do we want to release 3.0.0 or the next milestone? > 3.0.0 or 3.0.1 (this should be > 3.0.0Mxx) is good for me > 2. What with the road map on the first page ...? > What about dropping it ? we are an OS project and usually OS projects move forward thanks to individual contributions > 3. JDK 8 as target - without refactor - will it be acceptable? - cause to > stop upgrading some dependencies like commons-io > +1 > 4. Final list of acceptable PR to merge before release > I would not commit anything that is not strictly needed to make the release "stable" Enrico > > My proposition of PR to merge before release - please comment on PR. > If no objections in PR I will try process one by one - to mitigate big load > on ci > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1398 > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/160 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1939 > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/387 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1962 > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/398 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1963 > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/399 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1964 > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/400 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1967 > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/407 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1959 > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/412 > > > niedz., 19 gru 2021 o 20:27 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > napisał(a): > > > In my opinion onmy M9 would be worth it but I don't think users care too > so > > we should go with 3.0.0, do other Mx in 3.0.x and if we want to tackle M9 > > items do a 3.1.0 (but not sure it bothers that much to be honest, it is > > more about being "clean" than anything else IMHO). > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > < > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > Le dim. 19 déc. 2021 à 20:17, Slawomir Jaranowski < > s.jaranow...@gmail.com> > > a écrit : > > > > > And what with the road map ... > > > > > > https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/index.html > > > > > > > > > > > > niedz., 19 gru 2021 o 19:32 Slawomir Jaranowski < > s.jaranow...@gmail.com> > > > napisał(a): > > > > > > > For Maven Api at the moment I think only change requirements and > > > > dependency ... without using new features - We are not sure if it > works > > > > with earlier versions anyway - minimal Maven on jenkins is 3.2.5 > > > > JDK 8 - also only target change - will open possibility to refactor > in > > > the > > > > feature > > > > > > > > But we needed to breaker compatibility for next 3.x releases. > > > > So we can start 3.x with such requirements. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > niedz., 19 gru 2021 o 19:18 Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > > > > napisał(a): > > > > > > > >> Don't think both are important to release, we can mention we only > > target > > > >> j8 > > > >> without doing the change I think, this one is more than ok now. > > > >> About JSR330 I think we are better staying away from it due to the > > > related > > > >> threads but it is internals anyway so not a big deal for surefire > > IMHO. > > > >> > > > >> Releasing the default change for trimstacktrace is a bigger thing > > > awaited > > > >> since the toggle was introduced for ex, and having a maintained > final > > > >> release is key for users so the only path we can take IMHO. > > > >> > > > >> Romain Manni-Bucau > > > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > > >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > > >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > > >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > > >> < > > > >> > > > > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Le dim. 19 déc. 2021 à 19:10, Slawomir Jaranowski < > > > s.jaranow...@gmail.com > > > >> > > > > >> a écrit : > > > >> > > > >> > What do you think about: > > > >> > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1959 - even 3.2.5 > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1955 ... yes i > know > > > not > > > >> all > > > >> > like it, but when ... if we think about 3.0.0 version it be ok i > > think > > > >> > > > > >> > before release ... > > > >> > > > > >> > niedz., 19 gru 2021 o 19:02 Romain Manni-Bucau < > > rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >> > napisał(a): > > > >> > > > > >> > > AFAIK there was no real change since "Cutting a release for > > > Surefire?" > > > >> > from > > > >> > > april where work was not production ready. > > > >> > > That said I'm happy to get a 3.0.0 and maybe a 3.1.0 later since > > we > > > >> > > abandonned 2 officially and 3 looks quite stable enough. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > >> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > > >> > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > > >> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > > >> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > > >> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > > >> > > < > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Le dim. 19 déc. 2021 à 18:58, Gary Gregory < > > garydgreg...@gmail.com> > > > a > > > >> > > écrit : > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > At work, some of my colleagues balk at seeing milestone > versions > > > in > > > >> our > > > >> > > > builds. What is preventing the next version from being > "3.0.0", > > no > > > >> > "M". I > > > >> > > > thought I read here a while back that the code was production > > > ready. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Gary > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Sun, Dec 19, 2021, 12:26 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Sounds good. > > > >> > > > > I'd really like to review/include this PR as well > > > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/400 > > > >> > > > > I hope to finish the review for this one during the week. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 at 18:22, Slawomir Jaranowski < > > > >> > > > s.jaranow...@gmail.com> > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Last time I did the surefire build more stable. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Now build looks ok on Jenkins > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://ci-maven.apache.org/job/Maven/job/maven-box/job/maven-surefire/job/master/ > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I prepared proposition for using shared GitHub action for > > > >> project > > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/410 > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Most of the tests look stable now. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > There are still about 260 issues on Jira. > > > >> > > > > > Many of them was create some year ago ... so probably are > > not > > > >> > actual > > > >> > > or > > > >> > > > > are > > > >> > > > > > duplicated > > > >> > > > > > Some look like they are in progress without finishing, > > > >> > > > > > I will work with Jira. I will try to ask about current > issue > > > >> > status. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > The last release was in Jun 2020 so 1 and half year ago. > > > >> > > > > > I think that we should plan the next release for Surefire > > > which > > > >> can > > > >> > > > help > > > >> > > > > > resolve some of the issues. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I don't know what the next version should be - in code we > > have > > > >> > > > > > 3.0.0-M6-SNAPSHOT. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > There are also about 30 PRs, some of them also created a > > years > > > >> ago > > > >> > .. > > > >> > > > > > should be closed or merged. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I need your help to plan and finally prepare for release. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Below is the result of the investigation for project > status > > > from > > > >> > > > > repository > > > >> > > > > > perspective and Jira perspective. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Current repository status > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > branch release/2.22.3 > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > f14da3b89 [SUREFIRE-1764] Upgrade JUnit Platform to 1.6.1 > > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/commit/f14da3b89 > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > current version in master is 1.3.2 for > > > junit-platform-launcher - > > > >> > the > > > >> > > > > newest > > > >> > > > > > available version is 1.8.2 > > > >> > > > > > SUREFIRE-1764 - reopened > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > branch release/3.0.0-M6 > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > 8a6b33453 (upstream/release/3.0.0-M6, > > origin/release/3.0.0-M6) > > > >> > > > > > [SUREFIRE-1432] Add extension interface with two > > > implementations > > > >> > for > > > >> > > > > > trimStackTrace > > > >> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/commit/8a6b33453 > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > SUREFIRE-1432 - reopened > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > There is about 130 commit to master since last tag > > > >> > surefire-3.0.0-M5 > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/compare/surefire-3.0.0-M5...master > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > JIRA status > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > RELEASE Backlog > > > >> > > > > > - don't look here ... > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > RELEASE 2.21.1 > > > >> > > > > > - SUREFIRE-1371 - only planed - no PR > > > >> > > > > > - SUREFIRE-1374 - in progres .... some commit exist in > > master > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > RELEASE 2.22.3 > > > >> > > > > > - SUREFIRE-1679 - commit on master OK > > > >> > > > > > - SUREFIRE-1764 - reopened only in release/2.22.3 branch > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > RELEASE 3.0 > > > >> > > > > > 22 issues, 4 issues mark as done but all without changes > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > RELEASE 3.0.1 > > > >> > > > > > 1 issues - SUREFIRE-1430 - only planed > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > =========================================================== > > > >> > > > > > RELEAAE 3.0.0-M6 > > > >> > > > > > 69 issues, 46 done, 3 in progress, 20 to do > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > -- > > > >> > > > > > Sławomir Jaranowski > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > Sławomir Jaranowski > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Sławomir Jaranowski > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sławomir Jaranowski > > > > > > > > -- > Sławomir Jaranowski >
