On Fri 4 Jan 2019 at 22:00, Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> wrote:

> @Stephen Connolly <steph...@apache.org>
>  After such a big investment, especially made on your side, in Jenkins
> plugin you developed you do not want to support the GitHub PRs and you just
> let be to go with TravisCI just like that? I do not think so!


I want to add GitHub support to ASF Jenkins too, but PR verification should
be layers. No harm in having one layer provided by Travis/Codeship/etc and
the second layer by Jenkins.

The other point is even if I add PR support to the ASF Jenkins, it’s not
going to be automatic build for non-committers (which is the group of PRs
that need the CI feedback most, and with least delay... ie before they walk
away) as we simply do not have throw-away infra for building PRs that could
contain bitcoin miners triggered by a unit test, etc.

Now if infra wants to set up a dedicated “safe space” for untrusted PRs to
be built... super... but until that happens, we’ll need something like
Travis to take that risk for us.


> T
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 7:22 PM Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 from me
> >
> > On Fri 4 Jan 2019 at 18:21, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I would like to try out Travis on this small plugin:
> > > https://github.com/apache/maven-scripting-plugin
> > >
> > > I have pushed a minimal configuration file
> > > I need to ask to Infra, but I need approval from the community and
> > PMCs...
> > >
> > > Can I proceed ?
> > >
> > > Enrico
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> > >
> > > --
> > Sent from my phone
> >
>
-- 
Sent from my phone

Reply via email to