Le mardi 20 mai 2014 09:52:26 William Ferguson a écrit : > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:47 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr>wrote: > > > 1) Is there no automatic checkstyle verification as part of the build? > > > We > > > use it in the android-maven-plugin and I though it was standard practice > > > across the Maven projects. > > > > it's only done on site generation, and you can simply ignore the result > > does android-maven-plugin have more aggressive configuration? > > Yes. Std build fails unless it complies. > > IMO that's what you need since it is the developer committing code that has > the understanding necessary to provide the Javadoc comments. And invariably > it is the Javadoc comments that suffer. ok, I see: like rat
we never had courage to do so, feeling that this would be seen as a hurdle to contribution: the exact opposite of actual idea, that it would help contributors to simply follow conventions locally before submitting patch (and avoid "people who know and care" take time to fix things as much as they can) if you look at checkstyle report on every component, you'll see that there are many conventions not followed in general. Perhaps if we chose a subset of conventions and made them active as default, this could be ok: I didn't really tried to do so and convince the team that this could be more helpful than nasty Regards, Hervé --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
