Hi again,
Cor Nouws wrote:
John McCreesh wrote:
The ideas I haven't used (yet - I'm open to persuasion) are:
Novell OOo vs StarOffice ... Novell OOo does have some significant
differences from OOo - it's never quite become a fork, but neither is it
the same product ... what do people think?
My suggestion does not come from the differences. Those are few. And
will become even less, since VBA-interoperability efforts will be combined.
My suggestion was from the point of view that companies who invest a lot
in OOo, can be handled equally.
I've two resources that shine some light on this:
A very interasting mail from Bernd Eilers (cc), recently on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=discuss&msgNo=59759
Allthough I've some questions about the statistics, it shows what we
know: Sun does the most for development.
For the current situation, one would like to have data showing what
changed last year or so.
And - als mentioned by Bernd - it is rough material.
Another source: the wiki.
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/DomainDeveloper
Little count of developpers and qa-quys:
Sun Microsystems 103
Novell 14
Beijing Red Flag 9
Intel Corporation 7
others (ind. / corp.) 95
But here also: we are not sure who is spending how much time on OOo.
Any thoughts?
--
Cor Nouws
Arnhem - Netherlands
nl.OpenOffice.org - marketing contact
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
