On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 04:35:26 -0600, Laurent Godard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi
OOo as a 1200+ pages reference document and an active community around
the api (with snippets site aso). it is wrong to say that it is poorly
documented
If anyone is interested in doing this, I can put you in touch with some
outside developers who currently use OOo as a development platform, or
would like to do so in the future.
And why not suggesting them joining the community, at Extensions project
if their willing to help and contribute ?
Laurent
The language barrier might be one, this is a two way street. We definetly
dont want to duplicate efforts but this case I guess there might be some
overlapping. Native-Lang can aproach language specific groups and then
promote them to the Extension project but also have enough information to
have a local language-centric development community. This would make it
easier and more likely to be adopted. To achieve this we would need a list
of a 'most have' documents around the wiki and have a 'kit' of documents
to get people started. Then Native-Lang could localize them and have the
communities read from from it.
This is what I mean with promoting the framework. PyUNO exclusive DOES
lack a lot of documentation even on the wiki. There are currently just a
few pages dedicated to the framework and the documentation is very
outdated (around 2.0 launch). There is also a lot of information on the
forums (OOoForum) that might need to be backported into the wiki etc. Like
Laurent said there IS a significant development community, which is
great. The point of this email was to refocus our efforts on approaching
developers.
--
Alexandro Colorado
Grupo de Usuarios Linux Tabasco
http://www.gultab.org
OpenOffice.org
Community Contact // Mexico
http://www.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
