Ian Lynch schreef:
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 10:24 -0500, Chad Smith wrote:
Of course, there is
pontital for exploitation - anyone wants to kill a thread that they don't
agree with - they just reply using the [FLAME] marker - but the next person
could not reply to that post or simply remove it from the subject line....
I dunno, just thinking out loud here. What do you think?
I think it would be better to talk about marketing strategy and actions
and not get emotionally wound up at perceived criticism. But perhaps
that is too much to ask ;-)
Strategy is important as well as development. The strategy to go for a
wiki is a good one. Question is why it took 5 years to realise it, not
to blame anyone but to make sure we are more productive in the future.
Because there is no strategy...
a quote from RealGrouchy:
"My focus in this discussion is on the use of the wiki for
brainstorming and idea development, not for decision-making. I feel
that a wiki should be what a wiki is: You post stuff, and if people
don't like it, they change or delete it. The website is for the
finished product."
This actually is a very good idea... Having a website for marketing purposes... Something like a "end user layer"...
This has been proposed several times and enden up to be a the wiki. Unsuitable for those needs but great for brainstorming, where it not that it had to be organised and structured to be a replacement for the existing marketing development website.
I strongly advice all to listen to RealGrouchy. He knows what he is talking
about!!.
Steven P
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
