On Tue, January 10, 2006 13:42, John McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 23:41 -0500, DC Parris wrote:
>> Greetings!
>>
>> I am responding to an article that claims Microsoft invests $50b/year in
>> R&D - as if the libre software community doesn't invest in R&D.  I
>> believe
>> it does.  Can the OOo team help me quantify what gets invested in R&D?
>> I
>> am also contacting some other major projects, but would like to get some
>> input from the folks at OOo.
>>
>> Don
>
> To compare like with like, you may need to look at developer manhours
> per annum generated by Microsoft compared to the open-source
> community...
>
> John
>

Here's the general gist - which I have communicated to most of the folks
I've contacted:

The gist of my article is that R&D for GNU/Linux and FOSS has to be
considered on a different basis than Microsoft's approach.  As an example,
Microsoft may well spend $50 billion/year in R&D.  Against the backdrop of
what they distribute, it seems like they're throwing money away.  After
$50b, a WMF vulnerability puts 600 million users at risk.  On the FOSS
side of the house, no single company has a need to invest $50 billion/year
because they are essentially getting free R&D, and much of that goes
unaccounted for.

Don
-- 
DC Parris
http://matheteuo.org/  http://chaddb.sourceforge.net/
"Hey man, whatever pickles your file!"

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to