John McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hallo John,
> Believe me, Jacqueline has tried tried this on numerous occasions, and > [ ... ] > and they have the time available, they may pick it up. I know all these things and I know that you can find just 1 man from 10.000 which is really working on something. That's truth and we can't change this from day to day. But, even if these things are not so optimistic, there should be "open source" way of working ... What I mean with this? You are working on Product specs? That's great, thanks for it, but let this know to the community, create an Issue, attach your work to it or just write some comments into it from time to time. This should be done even if you know that nobody will read this Issue ... You can catch the only 1 (from 10.000) via this way too ... You (as the lead, co-lead) should show the people, that things are moving, even if they are moving slowly, but you should show that the project is about real work and not about long threads without any consequent work. These things are discouraging people and we should remove all these bad things and open everything as much as possible. I know that it's not easy, there is no short time motivation, but for the long run, it has long list of benefits and probably more volunteers. > You are right. It's patchy across the community. But let's try an > experiment. Thanks for this, I'll resend the link to the czech marketing project and we will help you with it. But don't call it 'experiment' and do this on regular basis, with everything even if you know what's the current status. -- Robert Vojta http://blog.vojta.name/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
