[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13062806#comment-13062806
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2048:
--------------------------------------------
Awesome to finally have progress here!
I agree we should cutover to an enum instead of 2 coupled booleans... I think
IndexOptions is a good name.
> Omit positions but keep termFreq
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2048
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2048
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/index
> Affects Versions: 3.1
> Reporter: Andrzej Bialecki
> Assignee: Robert Muir
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2048.patch
>
>
> it would be useful to have an option to discard positional information but
> still keep the term frequency - currently setOmitTermFreqAndPositions
> discards both. Even though position-dependent queries wouldn't work in such
> case, still any other queries would work fine and we would get the right
> scoring.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
