[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13062694#comment-13062694
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2048:
-------------------------------------
by the way, i'll look at tests tomorrow (I know the thing has bare minimum
tests), and as for the enum, i don't care at all what the naming is, i just
needed something.
i simply refuse to use 2 booleans here with checks/assertions throughout the
code ensuring the are in sync, i think thats really the wrong way to go.
> Omit positions but keep termFreq
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2048
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2048
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/index
> Affects Versions: 3.1
> Reporter: Andrzej Bialecki
> Assignee: Robert Muir
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2048.patch
>
>
> it would be useful to have an option to discard positional information but
> still keep the term frequency - currently setOmitTermFreqAndPositions
> discards both. Even though position-dependent queries wouldn't work in such
> case, still any other queries would work fine and we would get the right
> scoring.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
