[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15991357#comment-15991357
 ] 

Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-9386:
----------------------------------

bq. Steve Rowe, in newer ZK versions, standalone servers no longer require a 
myid file. We shouldn't need to handle that any more. I can't locate the 
ZOOKEEPER issue where that was changed, so I do not know what version made our 
standalone config work, but I'm pretty sure that 3.4.8 had it.

I looked at the {{QuorumPeerConfig.parseConfiguration()}} code, and as you say, 
the existence of a {{myid}} file is only checked for when the number of servers 
is greater than one.

However, there is other code that enables Solr's embedded ZK to participate in 
a quorum, so I think removing code that allows that would be a mistake.  I 
haven't tested setting up a quorum exclusively with embedded ZK in multiple 
Solr nodes, but I assume that's possible. 

> Upgrade Zookeeper to 3.4.10
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-9386
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9386
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Task
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Steve Rowe
>            Assignee: Steve Rowe
>             Fix For: 6.6, master (7.0)
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-9386-fix-clientPort-parsing.patch, SOLR-9386.patch, 
> SOLR-9386.patch, SOLR-9386.patch, zookeeper-3.4.8-upgrade-tests-pass.patch, 
> zookeeper-3.4.9-upgrade-tests-fail.patch
>
>
> Zookeeper 3.4.10 release should be happening fairly soon, and the ZK issue 
> blocking incorporation into Solr (ZOOKEEPER-2383) has a 3.4.10-targetted 
> patch that fixes the test failures problem noted on SOLR-8724.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to