+1
SUCCESS! [0:54:27.140402]

> On Aug 22, 2016, at 23:59, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> +1
> SUCCESS! [4:06:37.981292]
> 
> Le lun. 22 août 2016 à 09:00, Noble Paul <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
> I'm not sure if there is going to be a respin. SOLR-9310 is a
> worthwhile addition
> 
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for testing on Linux, Steve (we chatted on IRC). I committed the new 
> > policy file change to master, 6.x and also 6.2 (but no respin needed, as 
> > this only fixes Jenkins).
> >
> > Uwe
> >
> > -----
> > Uwe Schindler
> > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> > http://www.thetaphi.de <http://www.thetaphi.de/>
> > eMail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>]
> >> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2016 6:45 PM
> >> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.2.0 RC1
> >>
> >> Oh, I tried it out, this works:
> >>
> >>   permission java.io.FilePermission "${tests.linedocsfile}", "read";
> >>
> >> But you have to be sure that the path is resolving correctly (if its 
> >> relative).
> >>
> >> I will do a few more tests and commit this to master and 6.x + reconfigure
> >> Jenkins Nightly to enable Security Manager again.
> >>
> >> Uwe
> >>
> >> -----
> >> Uwe Schindler
> >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> >> http://www.thetaphi.de <http://www.thetaphi.de/>
> >> eMail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>
> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> > From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>]
> >> > Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2016 6:37 PM
> >> > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> > Cc: 'Steve Rowe' <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >> > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.2.0 RC1
> >> >
> >> > Hi Steve,
> >> >
> >> > I am planning to add support for another way to dynamically specify the
> >> > linedocsfile in the policy file, so it respects a linedocsfile outside 
> >> > the
> >> > checkout. Simply copypasting the ${tests.linedocsfile} property into the
> >> policy
> >> > file only works if the path is absolute, which is not guaranteed by the
> >> > sysprop...
> >> >
> >> > I will open an issue if I have an idea.
> >> >
> >> > Uwe
> >> >
> >> > -----
> >> > Uwe Schindler
> >> > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> >> > http://www.thetaphi.de <http://www.thetaphi.de/>
> >> > eMail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> > > From: Steve Rowe [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>]
> >> > > Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2016 6:15 PM
> >> > > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.2.0 RC1
> >> > >
> >> > > +1
> >> > >
> >> > > Smoke tester is happy now that it’s friends with Ant 1.9: SUCCESS!
> >> > > [0:28:35.468036]
> >> > >
> >> > > and docs, javadocs and changes look good.
> >> > >
> >> > > FYI I had to remove the “tests.linedocsfile” sysprop from my
> >> > > ~/lucene.build.properties to mollify the security manager.
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Steve
> >> > > www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/>
> >> > >
> >> > > > On Aug 21, 2016, at 4:48 AM, Michael McCandless
> >> > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Duh, sorry, I forgot to push this fix to the smoke tester (to also 
> >> > > > accept
> >> ant
> >> > > 1.9.x).  I'll go do that!
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Mike McCandless
> >> > > >
> >> > > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com <http://blog.mikemccandless.com/>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 2:38 AM, Christian Moen <[email protected] 
> >> > > > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > > Hi,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > My smoke tester gives the same error as Steve's.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Best,
> >> > > > Christian
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > On Aug 21, 2016, at 08:35, Steve Rowe <[email protected] 
> >> > > > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Hi Mike,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > The branch_6_2 smoke tester is irritated with your choice of Ant:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > RuntimeError: JAR file
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> "/tmp/smoke_lucene_6.2.0_764d0f19151dbff6f5fcd9fc4b2682cf934590c5_1/
> >> > > unpack/lucene-6.2.0/codecs/lucene-codecs-6.2.0.jar" is missing "Ant-
> >> > > Version: Apache Ant 1.8" inside its META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > And that file has:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >   Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.9.7
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I saw a commit notification about addressing one aspect of that, 
> >> > > > > but I
> >> > > guess not the manifest aspect?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > --
> >> > > > > Steve
> >> > > > > www.lucidworks.com <http://www.lucidworks.com/>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >> On Aug 20, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Michael McCandless
> >> > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 6.2.0
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >> > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.2.0- 
> >> > > > >> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.2.0->
> >> RC1-
> >> > > rev764d0f19151dbff6f5fcd9fc4b2682cf934590c5
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \
> >> > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.2.0- 
> >> > > > >> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.2.0->
> >> RC1-
> >> > > rev764d0f19151dbff6f5fcd9fc4b2682cf934590c5
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> Here's my +1
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> SUCCESS! [0:21:39.759298]
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> Mike McCandless
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> http://blog.mikemccandless.com <http://blog.mikemccandless.com/>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
> >> > > > > <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
> >> > > > > <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
> >> > > > <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
> >> > > > <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
> >> > > <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
> >> > > <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
> >> > <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
> >> > <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
> >> <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
> >> <mailto:[email protected]>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Noble Paul
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> 

Reply via email to