On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Yonik Seeley
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Yonik Seeley
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> I don't really think things like this (queries etc) should go into just 
>>>> Solr
>>>
>>> I disagree strongly with the sentiment that queries don't belong in Solr.
>>> Everything developed in/for lucene need not be exported to Solr immediately.
>>> Everything developed in/for solr need not be exported to Lucene immediately.
>>>
>>> If the work has been done, and the patch works for Solr, that should
>>> be enough.  Period.
>>
>> This is an important enough point that I'm going to follow it up with
>> a quote from Mike:
>>
>> "The combined dev community would have no requirement/expectation that
>> if someone adds something cool to Lucene they must also expose it in
>> Solr. There will still be devs that wear mostly Solr vs most Lucene
>> hats. There will also be devs that comfortably wear both. There will
>> be devs that focus on analyzers and do amazing things ;)"
>>
>> We merged to *enable* moving code around easier, not to mandate it.
>> It is wrong to object to a patch because someone hasn't done extra
>> work with their solr hat on to enable it's use in solr.
>> It is wrong to object to a patch because someone hasn't done extra
>> work with their lucene hat on enable it's use in lucene.
>>
>>
>> With that out of the way, let's get more specific: what "Query" in
>> this patch should be moved, and to where?
>>
>
> No, the question is: what justification is there for adding spatial
> support to solr-only, leaving lucene with a broken contrib module,
> versus adding it where it belongs and exposing it to solr?

There need not be any linkage to lucene to improve a Solr feature.
If you disagree, we should vote to clarify - this is too important
(and too much of a negative for Solr).

-Yonik

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to