On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Yonik Seeley <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) <[email protected]> wrote: >> I don't really think things like this (queries etc) should go into just Solr > > I disagree strongly with the sentiment that queries don't belong in Solr. > Everything developed in/for lucene need not be exported to Solr immediately. > Everything developed in/for solr need not be exported to Lucene immediately. > > If the work has been done, and the patch works for Solr, that should > be enough. Period.
This is an important enough point that I'm going to follow it up with a quote from Mike: "The combined dev community would have no requirement/expectation that if someone adds something cool to Lucene they must also expose it in Solr. There will still be devs that wear mostly Solr vs most Lucene hats. There will also be devs that comfortably wear both. There will be devs that focus on analyzers and do amazing things ;)" We merged to *enable* moving code around easier, not to mandate it. It is wrong to object to a patch because someone hasn't done extra work with their solr hat on to enable it's use in solr. It is wrong to object to a patch because someone hasn't done extra work with their lucene hat on enable it's use in lucene. With that out of the way, let's get more specific: what "Query" in this patch should be moved, and to where? -Yonik http://www.lucenerevolution.org -- Lucene/Solr User Conference, May 25-26, San Francisco --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
