Hi Adrien, Thanks for informing but I think it still makes sense for us to release a 5.3.2 for users who have decided to be on or are already on 5.3.x. 5.4 might mean a complicated upgrade for those users.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: > That's fine with me, I just wanted to make sure that the fact that 5.4.1 > will go out soon does't change our considerations. > > Le mar. 12 janv. 2016 à 09:39, Shai Erera <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> I think that the reason for this release was to offer users who have just >> upgraded to 5.3 those bug fixes, without requiring them to upgrade to 5.4. >> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:37 AM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Anshum, >>> >>> Just in case you didn't see the other thread called "5.4.1 release", we >>> need to do a bugfix release to address a potential corruption that affects >>> Lucene/Solr 5.4.0. Since this 5.4.1 release ought to contain all fixes that >>> are also in 5.3.2, maybe it's not worth releasing 5.3.2 anymore? Sorry for >>> only suggesting it now, I know you already spent time on this release but >>> wanted to make sure that you were aware that we need to do a 5.4.1 soon as >>> well. >>> >>> Le lun. 11 janv. 2016 à 21:38, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> a >>> écrit : >>> >>>> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.3.2 >>>> >>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >>>> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.3.2-RC1-rev1723976 >>>> >>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py >>>> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.3.2-RC1-rev1723976 >>>> >>>> Sorry for the super long delay but my internet connection required 4 >>>> attempts to commit the RC. >>>> -- >>>> Anshum Gupta >>>> >>> -- Anshum Gupta
