That's fine with me, I just wanted to make sure that the fact that 5.4.1 will go out soon does't change our considerations.
Le mar. 12 janv. 2016 à 09:39, Shai Erera <[email protected]> a écrit : > I think that the reason for this release was to offer users who have just > upgraded to 5.3 those bug fixes, without requiring them to upgrade to 5.4. > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:37 AM Adrien Grand <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Anshum, >> >> Just in case you didn't see the other thread called "5.4.1 release", we >> need to do a bugfix release to address a potential corruption that affects >> Lucene/Solr 5.4.0. Since this 5.4.1 release ought to contain all fixes that >> are also in 5.3.2, maybe it's not worth releasing 5.3.2 anymore? Sorry for >> only suggesting it now, I know you already spent time on this release but >> wanted to make sure that you were aware that we need to do a 5.4.1 soon as >> well. >> >> Le lun. 11 janv. 2016 à 21:38, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >> >>> Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.3.2 >>> >>> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.3.2-RC1-rev1723976 >>> >>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py >>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.3.2-RC1-rev1723976 >>> >>> Sorry for the super long delay but my internet connection required 4 >>> attempts to commit the RC. >>> -- >>> Anshum Gupta >>> >>
