Thanks, David. Will let you know, how it went.
On 5 May 2015 at 20:01, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes. > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 8:29 AM Dmitry Kan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi David, >> >> Thanks for replying so quick! Indeed, the NPE points to SolrCore being >> null. So of the following two ctors: >> >> public DefaultSolrHighlighter() { >> } >> >> public DefaultSolrHighlighter(SolrCore solrCore) { >> this.solrCore = solrCore; >> } >> >> >> >> should we use the second one? >> >> Regards, >> Dmitry >> >> On 5 May 2015 at 15:03, [email protected] < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Dmitry, >>> >>> I am pretty well versed in the sub-class-ability of >>> DefaultSolrHighlighter. Most likely the problem you see is that you are >>> using the no-arg constructor. Instead, pass in a SolrCore. It is called >>> via reflection. In 5.2 I removed the no-arg constructor. >>> >>> ~ David >>> >>> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:24 AM Dmitry Kan <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> We need to modify the behaviour of DefaultSolrHighlighter class >>>> slightly. When we tried to extend the class, Solr prints NPE. >>>> >>>> Is there some reason to the NPE when extending the class? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Dmitry Kan >>>> >>> >>
