[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14380739#comment-14380739
]
Toke Eskildsen commented on SOLR-7296:
--------------------------------------
Same warning from me: My knowledge of Lucene faceting is quite poor. Looking at
guides to Lucene Faceting, it seems to be well thought out and very extensible.
That supports the idea of using that as base. My main concern is the use of a
central taxonomy service as it seems to collide with SolrCloud. I do not know
if it is possible to avoid this service and what the cost would be.
> Reconcile facetting implementations
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-7296
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7296
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: faceting
> Reporter: Steve Molloy
>
> SOLR-7214 introduced a new way of controlling faceting, the unmbrella
> SOLR-6348 brings a lot of improvements in facet functionality, namely around
> pivots. Both make a lot of sense from a user perspective, but currently have
> completely different implementations. With the analytics components, this
> makes 3 implementation of the same logic, which is bound to behave
> differently as time goes by. We should reconcile all implementations to ease
> maintenance and offer consistent behaviour no matter how parameters are
> passed to the API.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
