[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14380463#comment-14380463
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-7296:
------------------------------------
I have a question, which might be insane. Warning: I know practically nothing
about any of the implementations:
Based on what I've learned from surface glancing at issues, Lucene includes
what looks to me like an extensive faceting API. Do the implementations in
Solr offer any advantages that can't be folded into the Lucene API? I'm asking
because as long as we are consolidating implementations, I'm wondering if it
make sense to consolidate all of the available implementations into the Lucene
API.
> Reconcile facetting implementations
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-7296
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7296
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: faceting
> Reporter: Steve Molloy
>
> SOLR-7214 introduced a new way of controlling faceting, the unmbrella
> SOLR-6348 brings a lot of improvements in facet functionality, namely around
> pivots. Both make a lot of sense from a user perspective, but currently have
> completely different implementations. With the analytics components, this
> makes 3 implementation of the same logic, which is bound to behave
> differently as time goes by. We should reconcile all implementations to ease
> maintenance and offer consistent behaviour no matter how parameters are
> passed to the API.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
