+1 for keeping multiple branches for older versions and moving forward to
new branch with latest java

On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
> On Sep 19, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Yonik Seeley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> People will upgrade when
> >> the new features they want in the latest release outweigh the mythical
> pain
> >> of upgrading a JDK.
> >
> > Perhaps the technical pain of upgrade is largely mythical, but it's
> > real pain for real users who have no say over what version of Java
> > they can run (or at a minimum have to jump  through a lot of hoops to
> > change the java version).
>
> Fully well aware of this, but trunk is not, by definition released, so
> there is nothing for them to upgrade to.
>
> >
> > There is no right answer... it's a judgement call where we should
> > weigh all the factors each time we require a new Java version.  People
> > may weigh factors differently, but no factor should be dismissed out
> > of hand.
>
> Of course not, just saying I personally think trunk should move forward as
> fast as the regular contributors and committers want, which means, we
> decide/vote and then move on based on the outcome and that the branches (4x
> or 5x or whatever) should be slower to make any changes.  People who take
> years to upgrade their JDK also likely take years to upgrade Lucene or Solr
> or whatever.  I'm all for keeping and maintaining older branches for those
> who don't want to upgrade as long as the community is willing to support
> them.
>
> As for Doug's comments, I think they reflect a time when we only
> maintained one branch and it was more of a forced decision for users.  It
> isn't as cut and dried anymore with multiple branches, services like Solr
> and ES, etc.  I do agree, wholeheartedly however, that we should all be
> thoughtful and considerate of other's opinions in the process.
>
> -Grant
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to