[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4371:
--------------------------------

    Attachment: LUCENE-4371.patch

Cleaned up patch (as trunk has changed much), I think I'm happy with this one:

Just a summary:

* Remove IndexInputSlicer and Directory.createSlicer()
* Add abstract IndexInput.slice(), behaves like clone(), but takes offset and 
length
* MMap, NIOFS, SimpleFS just clone with adjusted offset.
* MMap "slice-of-slice" assert (cfs within cfs) is removed because 
Lucene40DocValues does this, and slicing a slice now does what you think 
(before you got the default buffering impl over mmap...)
* the previous "Default impl" is moved to BufferedIndexInput.wrap(). Its only 
used by RAMdir and a few other wierd ones. This makes it explicit they are 
using buffering wrapper for CFS.


> consider refactoring slicer to indexinput.slice
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-4371
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4371
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>         Attachments: LUCENE-4371.patch, LUCENE-4371.patch, LUCENE-4371.patch, 
> LUCENE-4371.patch
>
>
> From LUCENE-4364:
> {quote}
> In my opinion, we should maybe check, if we can remove the whole Slicer in 
> all Indexinputs? Just make the slice(...) method return the current 
> BufferedIndexInput-based one. This could be another issue, once this is in.
> {quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to