+1 to do the next bugfix release for 2.9.x and 3.0.x. In general I think whenever we backport an important bug fix (which, if we are backporting to 2.9.x/3.0.x, it's only because it is in fact important!), we should do the point release.
I commented on LUCENE-2675... Mike On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > I am talking about LUCENE-2675. I want to get this in - it is simple and > makes work easier when you move from 2.9 to 3.0 or vice versa during > development. Any other comments from others except Robert *g*? > > I would manage to build 2.9.4 and 3.0.3 in parallel, sync the changes.txt and > merge the combined ones to trunk/3.x. That's most of the work, the build > itself is easy with my scripts :-) I just need the information, if there is > anything else that should go into 2.9.4/3.0.3. > > Uwe > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] >> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 9:25 AM >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: RE: Lucene 3.0.3 Release Date >> >> Will do it! I just want to get this 2.9 can read 3.0 indexes in :-) >> >> Uwe >> >> ----- >> Uwe Schindler >> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen >> http://www.thetaphi.de >> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] >> > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 12:18 AM >> > To: dev@lucene.apache.org; kim...@gmail.com >> > Subject: Fwd: Lucene 3.0.3 Release Date >> > >> > Shay, I forwarded your idea to the -dev list. >> > >> > Personally I think this is a great idea, really whenever there is a >> > even a remote possibility of an index corruption, and we fix it, I >> > think we should aggressively issue a release. >> > >> > We also have some important bugfixes to things like NumericRangeQuery. >> > >> > I'll sign up to do it, unless Uwe has the time and prefers to (since >> > he has mastered the art of cranking these 2.9.x/3.0.x things out, and >> > it would be my first time/take me longer). >> > >> > What do you guys think? >> > >> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> > From: Shay Banon <kim...@gmail.com> >> > Date: Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:59 PM >> > Subject: Lucene 3.0.3 Release Date >> > To: java-u...@lucene.apache.org >> > >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > It seems like current 3.0 branch has accumulated some important bug >> > fixes, especially the possible index corruption bug. Is there a date >> > for a formal 3.0.3 release? >> > >> > -shay.banon >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For >> > additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional >> commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
