Will do it! I just want to get this 2.9 can read 3.0 indexes in :-) Uwe
----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 12:18 AM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org; kim...@gmail.com > Subject: Fwd: Lucene 3.0.3 Release Date > > Shay, I forwarded your idea to the -dev list. > > Personally I think this is a great idea, really whenever there is a even a > remote > possibility of an index corruption, and we fix it, I think we should > aggressively > issue a release. > > We also have some important bugfixes to things like NumericRangeQuery. > > I'll sign up to do it, unless Uwe has the time and prefers to (since he has > mastered the art of cranking these 2.9.x/3.0.x things out, and it would be my > first time/take me longer). > > What do you guys think? > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Shay Banon <kim...@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:59 PM > Subject: Lucene 3.0.3 Release Date > To: java-u...@lucene.apache.org > > > Hi, > > It seems like current 3.0 branch has accumulated some important bug fixes, > especially the possible index corruption bug. Is there a date for a formal > 3.0.3 > release? > > -shay.banon > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional > commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
