[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12914452#action_12914452
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2662:
-------------------------------------
bq. I guess that is the first step towards factoring it out of
TermsHashPerField, the next question is are we gonna do that in a different
issue and get this committed first?
I think it would be better if this class were used in the patch... i wouldn't
commit it by itself unused. Its difficult for people to review its behavior,
since its just a standalone unused thing (for instance, the hashCode thing i
brought up)
> BytesHash
> ---------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2662
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2662
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Index
> Affects Versions: Realtime Branch, 4.0
> Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
> Assignee: Simon Willnauer
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Realtime Branch, 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2662.patch, LUCENE-2662.patch
>
>
> This issue will have the BytesHash separated out from LUCENE-2186
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
