To be clear, what is fine? Leaving it as is, or breaking Core BC and make the change from "set" to "with" now?
Gary On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: > That's fine I think. > > (Shameless plug) Every java main() method deserves http://picocli.info > > > On Aug 18, 2017, at 7:18, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > What I did not do is change the "set" methods to "with" to avoid breaking > > user sources. We should do that for 3.0 I think. > > > > Gary > > > >> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> I like the idiom where setter methods return `this`, so users can chain > >> methods; thanks for making that change. > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 5:41 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi All and FYI: > >>> > >>> I plan on redoing the SocketOptions class as a real builder by making > all > >>> accessors return this. > >>> > >>> Any objections? > >>> > >>> Gary > >>> > >> >
