André Schnabel wrote: > Hi, > > Mathias Bauer schrieb: >> >> Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't it be possible to provide a custom >> build that contains the rollback changes that didn't make it into >> m59/m60? Translators could use this one instead of the milestone build. >> > > We do not translate "builds" we translate "source". So a custom build > would not help.
Well, a build also has a source. :-) > To map the idea to source code, we would need a special CWS, that rolls > back the changes That's what I wanted to propose. >- and we would need to have another cws to hold > translations for the "Rollback CWS" ... seems to be a little complicated > procedure to me. (At the other hand this is quite similar to what the > documentation team just tried). Why another CWS? Couldn't we use the same? And if we did it with Mercurial instead of svn it would be easy to handle: provide a repository on services.openoffice.org that everybody can clone and where changes could be pushed to. BTW: that's how I would recommend to work in future anyway. But YMMV. Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[email protected]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
