Unless anyone has objections, I'm going to update the KIP to remove the `Ignore` policy and make `None` as the default. I will also remove the ` default boolean useOverrides()` in the interface which was introduced for the purpose of backward compatibility.
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:27 PM Randall Hauch <rha...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have also seen users include in connector configs the `producer.*` and > `consumer.*` properties that should go into the worker configs. But those > don't match, and the likelihood that someone is already using > `producer.override.*` or `consumer.override.*` properties in their > connector configs does seem pretty tiny. > > I'd be fine with removing the `Ignore` for backward compatibility. Still +1 > either way. > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 5:23 PM Magesh Nandakumar <mage...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > To add more details regarding the backward compatibility; I have > generally > > seen users trying to set "producer.request.timeout.ms > > <http://producer.override.request.timeout.ms/>" in their connector > config > > under the assumption that it will get used and would never come back to > > remove it. The initial intent of the KIP was to use the same prefix but > > since that potentially collided with MM2 configs, we agreed to use a > > different prefix "producer.override". With this context, I think the > > likelihood of someone using this is very small and should generally not > be > > a problem. > > > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:15 PM Magesh Nandakumar <mage...@confluent.io> > > wrote: > > > > > Colin, > > > > > > Thanks a lot for the feedback. As you said, the possibilities of > someone > > > having "producer.override.request.timeout.ms" in their connector > config > > > in AK 2.2 or lower is very slim. But the key thing is if in case, > someone > > > has it AK2.2 doesn't do anything with it and it silently ignores the > > > configuration. If others think that it's not really a problem, then I'm > > > fine with removing the complicated compatibility issue. > > > > > > I have explicitly called out the behavior when the exception is thrown. > > > > > > Let me know what you think. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Magesh > > > > > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 2:45 PM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Magesh, > > >> > > >> Thanks for the KIP. It looks good overall. > > >> > > >> > default boolean useOverrides() { > > >> > return true; > > >> > } > > >> > > >> Is this method really needed? As I understand, nobody should have any > > >> connector client config overrides set right now, since they don't do > > >> anything right now. > > >> > > >> For example, you wouldn't expect a Kafka 2.2 installation to have " > > >> producer.override.request.timeout.ms" set, since that doesn't do > > >> anything in Kafka 2.2. So is the option to ignore it in Kafka 2.3 > > really > > >> necessary? > > >> > > >> Can you add some details about what happens if a > > >> PolicyValidationException is thrown? I'm assuming that we fail to > > create > > >> the new Connector, I'm not sure if that's completely spelled out > > (unless I > > >> missed it). > > >> > > >> best, > > >> Colin > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, May 9, 2019, at 08:05, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > > >> > Hi Magesh, > > >> > > > >> > Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding) > > >> > > > >> > Regards, > > >> > > > >> > Rajini > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 3:55 PM Randall Hauch <rha...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Nice work, Magesh. > > >> > > > > >> > > +1 (binding) > > >> > > > > >> > > Randall > > >> > > > > >> > > On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 7:22 PM Magesh Nandakumar < > > >> mage...@confluent.io> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks a lot Chris. So far, the KIP has one non-binding vote and > > I'm > > >> > > still > > >> > > > looking forward to the KIP to be voted by Friday's deadline. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 10:00 AM Chris Egerton < > > chr...@confluent.io> > > >> > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Hi Magesh, > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > This looks great! Very excited to see these changes finally > > >> coming to > > >> > > > > Connect. > > >> > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Cheers, > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Chris > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 9:51 AM Magesh Nandakumar < > > >> mage...@confluent.io > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi All, > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I would like to start a vote on > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-458%3A+Connector+Client+Config+Override+Policy > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > The discussion thread can be found here > > >> > > > > > < > > >> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg97124.html>. > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks, > > >> > > > > > Magesh > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
