Hello everybody, It's been a week since this KIP was first posted and not much discussion has been had. I can only assume people find the new metric somewhat reasonable. I will consider starting a voting thread after a couple of days if nobody has objections.
@Manikumar, Do you have any further thoughts in relation to my response? Thanks, Stanislav On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 12:00 PM Stanislav Kozlovski <stanis...@confluent.io> wrote: > Hello Manikumar, > > I am not sure if there is value in having both `upTime` and `startTime` > metrics, as one can be derived from the other. The question to me is which > one we should have - I had considered `upTime` as well; I don't have a > strong preference in between both in all honesty. I thought since they're > more or less equal to one another, `startTime` would be simpler and more > performant to return (no computation done on server/client) > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 8:17 AM Manikumar <manikumar.re...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks for the KIP. looks good to me. >> How about adding metric for upTime also? >> >> On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 1:21 PM Stanislav Kozlovski < >> stanis...@confluent.io> >> wrote: >> >> > Hey everybody, >> > >> > I'd like to start a discussion about a simple change - adding a metric >> > indicating the time at which the Kafka application has started. >> > >> > KIP: KIP-436 >> > < >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-436%3A+Add+a+metric+indicating+start+time >> > > >> > JIRA: KAFKA-7992 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7992> >> > Pull Request: 6318 <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/6318> >> > >> > I look forward to seeing people's thoughts. >> > >> > -- >> > Best, >> > Stanislav >> > >> > > > -- > Best, > Stanislav > -- Best, Stanislav
