Fair enough; could you summarize the open questions on the DISCUSS thread
then?

On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 9:46 AM Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io>
wrote:

> Guozhang,
>
> KIP deadline passed yesterday. The last comments on the DISCUSS thread
> are not addressed yet. We need to move this to 2.3.
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 1/24/19 4:23 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > I'd like to call out for another time on voting for this KIP, given the
> > deadline is approaching now.
> >
> >
> > Guozhang
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 3:11 PM John Roesler <j...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> >> FWIW, I'm also +1 on the consistency changes to Joined.
> >>
> >> -John
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 5:04 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello Florian,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the writeup! I made a pass on the wiki page itself and left
> a
> >>> comment on it regarding the newly added APIs. Could you take a look? If
> >>> that makes sense could you update the wiki page to make sure we have
> all
> >>> the relevant public API changes.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Guozhang
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 1:39 PM John Roesler <j...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Yes, thanks Florian!
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 (nonbinding) from me.
> >>>>
> >>>> -John
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 3:36 PM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks for the KIP Florian, it will be a useful addition.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +1 on the KIP for me.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Bill
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 4:31 PM Florian Hussonnois <
> >>>> fhussonn...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi folks,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I would like to initiate a vote for the following KIP :
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-307%3A+Allow+to+define+custom+processor+names+with+KStreams+DSL
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Note, there is still some minor discussions regarding the
> >>>> implementation.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Florian HUSSONNOIS
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> -- Guozhang
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

-- 
-- Guozhang

Reply via email to