+1 (nonbinding) from me.

Thanks for the KIP, Matthias.

-John

On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:01 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Matthias, I left some minor comments but since they do not involve
> in any major architectural changes and I did not feel strong about the
> naming etc as well. I'd +1 on the proposal as well.
>
> Feel free to reply / accept or reject my suggestions on the other DISCUSS
> thread.
>
>
> Guozhang
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 6:38 AM Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 05:09, Patrik Kleindl <pklei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > Thanks too
> > > Best regards
> > > Patrik
> > >
> > > > Am 16.01.2019 um 03:30 schrieb Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the KIP Matthias.
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > -Bill
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 7:33 PM Matthias J. Sax <
> matth...@confluent.io
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> I would like to start the vote for KIP-258:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-258%3A+Allow+to+Store+Record+Timestamps+in+RocksDB
> > > >>
> > > >> The KIP adds new stores that allow to store record timestamps next
> to
> > > >> key and value. Additionally, we will allow to upgrade exiting stores
> > to
> > > >> the new stores; this will allow us to use the new stores in the DSL
> > with
> > > >> a smooth upgrade path.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> -Matthias
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> -- Guozhang
>

Reply via email to