Thanks Matthias, I left some minor comments but since they do not involve
in any major architectural changes and I did not feel strong about the
naming etc as well. I'd +1 on the proposal as well.
Feel free to reply / accept or reject my suggestions on the other DISCUSS
thread.


Guozhang

On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 6:38 AM Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 05:09, Patrik Kleindl <pklei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> > Thanks too
> > Best regards
> > Patrik
> >
> > > Am 16.01.2019 um 03:30 schrieb Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the KIP Matthias.
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > -Bill
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 7:33 PM Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I would like to start the vote for KIP-258:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-258%3A+Allow+to+Store+Record+Timestamps+in+RocksDB
> > >>
> > >> The KIP adds new stores that allow to store record timestamps next to
> > >> key and value. Additionally, we will allow to upgrade exiting stores
> to
> > >> the new stores; this will allow us to use the new stores in the DSL
> with
> > >> a smooth upgrade path.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -Matthias
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>


-- 
-- Guozhang

Reply via email to