Thanks Matthias, I left some minor comments but since they do not involve in any major architectural changes and I did not feel strong about the naming etc as well. I'd +1 on the proposal as well.
Feel free to reply / accept or reject my suggestions on the other DISCUSS thread. Guozhang On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 6:38 AM Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 at 05:09, Patrik Kleindl <pklei...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks too > > Best regards > > Patrik > > > > > Am 16.01.2019 um 03:30 schrieb Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP Matthias. > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > -Bill > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 7:33 PM Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I would like to start the vote for KIP-258: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-258%3A+Allow+to+Store+Record+Timestamps+in+RocksDB > > >> > > >> The KIP adds new stores that allow to store record timestamps next to > > >> key and value. Additionally, we will allow to upgrade exiting stores > to > > >> the new stores; this will allow us to use the new stores in the DSL > with > > >> a smooth upgrade path. > > >> > > >> > > >> -Matthias > > >> > > >> > > > -- -- Guozhang