Done! https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=50859233&selectedPageVersions=1186&selectedPageVersions=1185
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 4:13 AM Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> wrote: > John, feel free to update the wiki accordingly. > > On 12/14/18 10:48 PM, John Roesler wrote: > > I guess it would be different if you had one vote instead of none. The > norm > > seems to be to just continue nagging people in the [VOTE] thread until > you > > accrue the needed votes. > > > > If I understand the policy, it's just there to prevent three committers > > from railroading a KIP though without giving everyone else a chance to > > downvote/veto if they are so inclined. > > > > It does sound like the wiki could be updated to clarify. > > > > Hope that helps, > > -John > > > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 2:47 PM Pellerin, Clement < > clement_pelle...@ibi.com> > > wrote: > > > >> I think that should be made clearer in the wiki because right now it > says: > >> The vote should remain open for 72 hours. > >> I'm sure I'm not alone to think this means the vote closes after 72h. > >> > >> I can keep the vote open and send a reminder, but technically, that's > the > >> same as a new vote when there were no previous votes. > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Mickael Maison [mailto:mickael.mai...@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 3:36 PM > >> To: dev > >> Subject: Re: what happens when a vote ends with no votes? > >> > >> A vote must stay open for _at least_ 72 hours to ensure people have a > >> chance to see it. > >> Apart from that these's no upper bound for the duration, some vote > >> threads are open for weeks > >> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 8:29 PM Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> It might have slipped through. You can try calling out VOTE > again > >> on the KIP. > >>> Thanks, > >>> Harsha > >>> > >>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018, at 12:19 PM, Pellerin, Clement wrote: > >>>> I called a vote on KIP-383 more than 72h ago but it attracted no votes > >>>> and no comments. > >>>> The rule requires lazy majority which demands at least 3 binding > votes. > >>>> What happens next? > >>>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Pellerin, Clement > >>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 2:17 PM > >>>> To: dev@kafka.apache.org > >>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] KIP-383 Pluggable interface for SSL Factory > >>>> > >>>> Since there was no objections, I'm calling a vote on KIP-383. > >>>> > >> > > > >
