I guess it would be different if you had one vote instead of none. The norm seems to be to just continue nagging people in the [VOTE] thread until you accrue the needed votes.
If I understand the policy, it's just there to prevent three committers from railroading a KIP though without giving everyone else a chance to downvote/veto if they are so inclined. It does sound like the wiki could be updated to clarify. Hope that helps, -John On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 2:47 PM Pellerin, Clement <clement_pelle...@ibi.com> wrote: > I think that should be made clearer in the wiki because right now it says: > The vote should remain open for 72 hours. > I'm sure I'm not alone to think this means the vote closes after 72h. > > I can keep the vote open and send a reminder, but technically, that's the > same as a new vote when there were no previous votes. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mickael Maison [mailto:mickael.mai...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 3:36 PM > To: dev > Subject: Re: what happens when a vote ends with no votes? > > A vote must stay open for _at least_ 72 hours to ensure people have a > chance to see it. > Apart from that these's no upper bound for the duration, some vote > threads are open for weeks > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 8:29 PM Harsha <ka...@harsha.io> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > It might have slipped through. You can try calling out VOTE again > on the KIP. > > Thanks, > > Harsha > > > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018, at 12:19 PM, Pellerin, Clement wrote: > > > I called a vote on KIP-383 more than 72h ago but it attracted no votes > > > and no comments. > > > The rule requires lazy majority which demands at least 3 binding votes. > > > What happens next? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Pellerin, Clement > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 2:17 PM > > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > > Subject: RE: [VOTE] KIP-383 Pluggable interface for SSL Factory > > > > > > Since there was no objections, I'm calling a vote on KIP-383. > > > >
