We were waiting for the system test results. There were few failures:
KAFKA-7579,  KAFKA-7559, KAFKA-7561
they are not blockers for 2.0.1 release. We need more votes from
PMC/committers :)

Thanks Stanislav! for the system test results.

Thanks,
Manikumar

On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 10:20 PM Eno Thereska <eno.there...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Anything else holding this up?
>
> Thanks
> Eno
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 10:27 AM Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding) ... I used the staged binaries and run tests with
> > different clients.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 4:29 AM Manikumar <manikumar.re...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
> > >
> > > This is the first candidate for release of Apache Kafka 2.0.1.
> > >
> > > This is a bug fix release closing 49 tickets:
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+2.0.1
> > >
> > > Release notes for the 2.0.1 release:
> > > http://home.apache.org/~manikumar/kafka-2.0.1-rc0/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> > >
> > > *** Please download, test and vote by  Tuesday, October 30, end of day
> > >
> > > Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> > > http://kafka.apache.org/KEYS
> > >
> > > * Release artifacts to be voted upon (source and binary):
> > > http://home.apache.org/~manikumar/kafka-2.0.1-rc0/
> > >
> > > * Maven artifacts to be voted upon:
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/
> > >
> > > * Javadoc:
> > > http://home.apache.org/~manikumar/kafka-2.0.1-rc0/javadoc/
> > >
> > > * Tag to be voted upon (off 2.0 branch) is the 2.0.1 tag:
> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/releases/tag/2.0.1-rc0
> > >
> > > * Documentation:
> > > http://kafka.apache.org/20/documentation.html
> > >
> > > * Protocol:
> > > http://kafka.apache.org/20/protocol.html
> > >
> > > * Successful Jenkins builds for the 2.0 branch:
> > > Unit/integration tests:
> > https://builds.apache.org/job/kafka-2.0-jdk8/177/
> > >
> > > /**************************************
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Manikumar
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to