Thanks. Tested basic building and running of unit and integration tests. They work. Tested docs. The following fails. Is it a known issue?
" ./gradlew aggregatedJavadoc with info: > Configure project : Building project 'core' with Scala version 2.11.12 Building project 'streams-scala' with Scala version 2.11.12 > Task :aggregatedJavadoc FAILED FAILURE: Build failed with an exception. * What went wrong: A problem was found with the configuration of task ':aggregatedJavadoc'. > No value has been specified for property 'outputDirectory'. * Try: Run with --stacktrace option to get the stack trace. Run with --info or --debug option to get more log output. Run with --scan to get full insights. * Get more help at https://help.gradle.org BUILD FAILED in 3s " Eno On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 3:29 AM Manikumar <manikumar.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers, > > This is the first candidate for release of Apache Kafka 2.0.1. > > This is a bug fix release closing 49 tickets: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+2.0.1 > > Release notes for the 2.0.1 release: > http://home.apache.org/~manikumar/kafka-2.0.1-rc0/RELEASE_NOTES.html > > *** Please download, test and vote by Tuesday, October 30, end of day > > Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: > http://kafka.apache.org/KEYS > > * Release artifacts to be voted upon (source and binary): > http://home.apache.org/~manikumar/kafka-2.0.1-rc0/ > > * Maven artifacts to be voted upon: > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/ > > * Javadoc: > http://home.apache.org/~manikumar/kafka-2.0.1-rc0/javadoc/ > > * Tag to be voted upon (off 2.0 branch) is the 2.0.1 tag: > https://github.com/apache/kafka/releases/tag/2.0.1-rc0 > > * Documentation: > http://kafka.apache.org/20/documentation.html > > * Protocol: > http://kafka.apache.org/20/protocol.html > > * Successful Jenkins builds for the 2.0 branch: > Unit/integration tests: https://builds.apache.org/job/kafka-2.0-jdk8/177/ > > /************************************** > > Thanks, > Manikumar >
