On 20.08.2018 00:19, Matthias J. Sax wrote:
@Nick: A KIP is only accepted if it got 3 binding votes, ie, votes from
committers. If you close the vote before that, the KIP would not be
accepted. Note that committers need to pay attention to a lot of KIPs
and it can take a while until people can look into it. Thanks for your
understanding.
@Jan: Can you give a little bit more context on your concerns? It's
unclear why you mean atm.
Just saying that we should peek at the Samza approach, it's a much more
powerful abstraction. We can ship a default MessageChooser
that looks at the topics priority.
@Adam: anyone can vote :)
-Matthias
On 8/19/18 9:58 AM, Adam Bellemare wrote:
While I am not sure if I can or can’t vote, my question re: Jan’s comment is,
“should we be implementing it as Samza does?”
I am not familiar with the drawbacks of the current approach vs how samza does
it.
On Aug 18, 2018, at 5:06 PM, n...@afshartous.com wrote:
I only saw one vote on KIP-349, just checking to see if anyone else would like
to vote before closing this out.
--
Nick
On Aug 13, 2018, at 9:19 PM, n...@afshartous.com wrote:
Hi All,
Calling for a vote on KIP-349
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-349%3A+Priorities+for+Source+Topics
--
Nick
